Showing posts with label available. Show all posts
Showing posts with label available. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

MSDE and ExecuteXmlReader()

Is it possible to use ExecuteXmlReader() with MSDE, I've eard tis method was only available with SQLServer...
JeffMSDE includes jutst about all of the functionality of the Standard Edition but with a special development and test end-user license agreement (EULA) that prohibits production deployment.

So, just about anything you can do with the Standard Edition you can do with MSDE.

Check out theChoosing an Edition of SQL Server 2000 whitepaper.

Terri

Monday, March 26, 2012

MSDE 2000 Release A - Query Analyzer included?

I installed MSDE 2000 Release A, but can't find the Query Analyzer. Is it
included, or only available with other SQL Server versions. If it is
included, then how do I install it? If not, can I download it from somewhere
else?
Hi
MSDE 2000 does not come with any of the tools like Query Analyzer or
Enterprise Manager.
You could download the evaluation edition of SQL Server 2000 and use those
tools for 120 days.
Regards
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Steve" <Steve@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:41977C7A-205A-4CDA-AD56-843DF8779DE6@.microsoft.com...
>I installed MSDE 2000 Release A, but can't find the Query Analyzer. Is it
> included, or only available with other SQL Server versions. If it is
> included, then how do I install it? If not, can I download it from
> somewhere
> else?
>

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

MSDE 1 or MSDE 2K ?

I want to experiment a little bit with the MSDE. I'll be working with
it strictly from Visual Basic 6.
I have both versions of MSDE available for installation (on
Windows2K). Which one should I use?
hi Martin,
"Martin" <martinvalley@.comcast.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:ku03605ao6d7v7o4vt9op58f1ob6f88m52@.4ax.com...
> I want to experiment a little bit with the MSDE. I'll be working with
> it strictly from Visual Basic 6.
> I have both versions of MSDE available for installation (on
> Windows2K). Which one should I use?
as MSDE 1.0 is base on SQL Server 2000 and is currently only in maintenance,
I'd stick with the live one, MSDE 2000, which is full supported and is
plenty of new features with regards to the SQL Server 7.0 code base...
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.6.0 - DbaMgr ver 0.52.0
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply
|||are things mixed up?
|||minor correction in <>
as MSDE 1.0 is base on SQL <Server 7.0> and is currently only in
maintenance,
I'd stick with the live one, MSDE 2000 (<based on SQL Server 2000>), which
is full supported and is
plenty of new features with regards to the SQL Server 7.0 code base...
MSDE 2000 (latest release) is available from
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
Thanks
Dave.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Marc" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:84CAA9BC-DE4F-4779-BE75-B6B715F4A6B4@.microsoft.com...
> are things mixed up?

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

MSDCT Volumes not available for SQL Install

There on and accessable through Explorer and Disk Management. However when I
try to install SQL as a new virtual instance I only have access to my Quorum
Resources.
Installing Sql2000 on 2003 server Active /Passive.
One instance is already installed and running. Has been for several months.
If I remember right for each SQL Instance you would need new spindles as
they cannot be shared between SQL Instances on a MSCS.
"dibblm" <dibblm@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u1cRduCIFHA.2456@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> There on and accessable through Explorer and Disk Management. However when
> I try to install SQL as a new virtual instance I only have access to my
> Quorum Resources.
> Installing Sql2000 on 2003 server Active /Passive.
> One instance is already installed and running. Has been for several
> months.
>
|||Correct.
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
http://www.msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"wasonce" <mike@.ntadmins.org> wrote in message
news:OzISmIQIFHA.576@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> If I remember right for each SQL Instance you would need new spindles as
> they cannot be shared between SQL Instances on a MSCS.
> "dibblm" <dibblm@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u1cRduCIFHA.2456@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
|||I dont understand what you mean as far as new spindles.
I have 3 columes in a 6TB SAN. I have SQL installed to one. With the datbase
on another and the log files on another. Thus utilizing 3 seperate volumes
for disaster management and recovery. What do you mean as far as needing a
new spindle?
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
message news:ekNy3YQIFHA.3364@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Correct.
> Cheers,
> Rod
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
> http://www.msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> "wasonce" <mike@.ntadmins.org> wrote in message
> news:OzISmIQIFHA.576@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
|||This article
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/colu...youbuyasan.asp
gives you great examples. More disks, more spindles.
Here is a pretty explanation of what a spindle is
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/s/spindle.html.
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"dibblm" <dibblm@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eSgSrfzIFHA.588@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>I dont understand what you mean as far as new spindles.
> I have 3 columes in a 6TB SAN. I have SQL installed to one. With the
> datbase on another and the log files on another. Thus utilizing 3 seperate
> volumes for disaster management and recovery. What do you mean as far as
> needing a new spindle?
>
> "Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
> message news:ekNy3YQIFHA.3364@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
|||I personally think this isn't my issues. I have 42 Drives (Or spindles) I
have plenty of room. The problem is with Sql itself on the install.
Something is hosed in the os where the SQL install doesnt even see the
resources.
Let me get you a little closer to the problem.
You state the sql setup.
You can shoose either local, remote or virtual. ( I choose virtual)
then you have to assign ip's and so on
once you get to the area where you pick where you want to install the
instance to.......... My only resource is the Quorum resource itself. I
do not even see my other resources that contain other volumes.
My initial install showed as follows
<Quorum>
<<<<<Q:
<<<<<F: ( left over storage that wasnt needed)
<MSDTC>
<<<<<G: ( About 2 TB of storage)
<<<<<H: (About 2 TB of storage)
<<<<<I: (About 2 TB of storage)
<WEB IP's>
<<<<<Resource of a list of clustered IP;s I use for internal web
addreses
Now when I re-intall or try to install a new instance...
I only see my Quorum resource. My other 2 resources arent even showing.. Yes
they are running , Yes they are on the same node in which I am installing
from. No I cannot see them from the other node when I move them and try to
install from the 2nd node ( as a test)
Everything works normal, I have a 1.5 TB Database that is growing daily that
works great, Clustered resources work and failover as planned.
Now after further explination. Do you still think that this is a spindle
issue when I have plenty of room to work with still?
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
message news:OVLes8zIFHA.1280@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> This article
> http://www.sqlservercentral.com/colu...youbuyasan.asp
> gives you great examples. More disks, more spindles.
> Here is a pretty explanation of what a spindle is
> http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/s/spindle.html.
> Cheers,
> Rod
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> "dibblm" <dibblm@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eSgSrfzIFHA.588@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
|||It sounds like you have configured the SAN as one drive to the OS, but with
multiple partitions. Clustering can only talk to drives, all parturitions
are treated as the same thing. Is this the case?
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"dibblm" <dibblm@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uS2K8L$IFHA.2784@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I personally think this isn't my issues. I have 42 Drives (Or spindles) I
> have plenty of room. The problem is with Sql itself on the install.
> Something is hosed in the os where the SQL install doesnt even see the
> resources.
> Let me get you a little closer to the problem.
> You state the sql setup.
> You can shoose either local, remote or virtual. ( I choose virtual)
> then you have to assign ip's and so on
> once you get to the area where you pick where you want to install the
> instance to.......... My only resource is the Quorum resource itself. I
> do not even see my other resources that contain other volumes.
> My initial install showed as follows
> <Quorum>
> <<<<<Q:
> <<<<<F: ( left over storage that wasnt needed)
> <MSDTC>
> <<<<<G: ( About 2 TB of storage)
> <<<<<H: (About 2 TB of storage)
> <<<<<I: (About 2 TB of storage)
> <WEB IP's>
> <<<<<Resource of a list of clustered IP;s I use for internal web
> addreses
> Now when I re-intall or try to install a new instance...
> I only see my Quorum resource. My other 2 resources arent even showing..
> Yes they are running , Yes they are on the same node in which I am
> installing from. No I cannot see them from the other node when I move them
> and try to install from the 2nd node ( as a test)
> Everything works normal, I have a 1.5 TB Database that is growing daily
> that works great, Clustered resources work and failover as planned.
> Now after further explination. Do you still think that this is a spindle
> issue when I have plenty of room to work with still?
> "Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
> message news:OVLes8zIFHA.1280@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
|||Not at all.
I have 6 mounted volumes.
C: (2 - 36 gig drives in a mirror 0+1 (Operating System))
D: CD Rom
F: (See quorum)
G: (14 - 146 Gig DRives. raid 5 with 1 HOT online spare( 2 TB))
H: (14 - 146 Gig DRives raid 5 with 1 HOT online spare( 2 TB))
I : (14 - 146 Gig DRives raid 5 with 1 HOT online spare( 2 TB))
QQuorum Drive - 2 36 Gig Drives 0+1 Mirror. 2 partitions. Q for Quorum 10
Gig - F for left over.)
SQL Was originally Installed to G Holding the data with H holding the log
files and I holding the backups.
Again,, When I install now to create a new virtual instance, I dont even see
the G, H, and I drives that are in the MSDTC Resource. I dont even see the
Resource. I will do another install today and priovide a screen capture of
my scenario. I will also Provide a screen capture of the mounted Volu mes.
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
message news:O6qswCAJFHA.3788@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> It sounds like you have configured the SAN as one drive to the OS, but
> with multiple partitions. Clustering can only talk to drives, all
> parturitions are treated as the same thing. Is this the case?
> Cheers,
> Rod
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> "dibblm" <dibblm@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uS2K8L$IFHA.2784@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
|||Ok, cause its just not adding up yet.
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
http://www.msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"dibblm" <dibblm@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:esFdXNXJFHA.2772@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Not at all.
> I have 6 mounted volumes.
> C: (2 - 36 gig drives in a mirror 0+1 (Operating System))
> D: CD Rom
> F: (See quorum)
> G: (14 - 146 Gig DRives. raid 5 with 1 HOT online spare( 2 TB))
> H: (14 - 146 Gig DRives raid 5 with 1 HOT online spare( 2 TB))
> I : (14 - 146 Gig DRives raid 5 with 1 HOT online spare( 2 TB))
> QQuorum Drive - 2 36 Gig Drives 0+1 Mirror. 2 partitions. Q for Quorum
> 10 Gig - F for left over.)
> SQL Was originally Installed to G Holding the data with H holding the log
> files and I holding the backups.
> Again,, When I install now to create a new virtual instance, I dont even
> see the G, H, and I drives that are in the MSDTC Resource. I dont even see
> the Resource. I will do another install today and priovide a screen
> capture of my scenario. I will also Provide a screen capture of the
> mounted Volu mes.
>
> "Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
> message news:O6qswCAJFHA.3788@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
|||Just to clarify you have what appears to your cluster as six physical disks
C: (2 - 36 gig drives in a mirror 0+1 (Operating System))
D: CD Rom
F: (See quorum)
G: (14 - 146 Gig DRives. raid 5 with 1 HOT online spare( 2 TB))
H: (14 - 146 Gig DRives raid 5 with 1 HOT online spare( 2 TB))
I : (14 - 146 Gig DRives raid 5 with 1 HOT online spare( 2 TB))
QQuorum Drive - 2 36 Gig Drives 0+1 Mirror. 2 partitions. Q for Quorum 10
Gig - F for left over.)
Based on this that would allow you to use disks G:, H: and I: as possible
SQL Server disks
you stated that "SQL Was originally Installed to G Holding the data with H
holding the log
files and I holding the backups."
That would leave you with only the Quorum drives Q:, F: as possible disks
Once you added the H: and I: drives to the existing SQL Server they are no
longer available for use with another instance of SQL Server.
Each SQL Server instance will require its own group, name, IP address and
phyiscal disk
Simple way to look at this is any disk in the group with an existing
instance of SQL Server will not be available and sharing of resources in a
group between multiple groups is not possible.
Dave Whitney
SQL Support